There is a whole genre of leader posts now. "The year I almost lost the company." "The night I cried in the car park." Long, honest, lots of applause in the comments.
Turns out it might not do what we think it does.
Namrata Goyal and three colleagues ran 10 experiments with more than 2,000 people and wrote it up for HBR this month, When Being Authentic Undermines Your Leadership. Sharing a painful setback got sympathy, but little authenticity. What people read as authentic was a choice. Something unconventional you decided to do, that cost you personally, and that you told people about without being asked.
That makes sense to me. A setback is something that happened to you. A choice shows what you stand for.
One detail I keep thinking about: it worked best for established leaders. Build the credibility first, then step away from convention.
So fewer stories about the hard times. More about what you chose, and what it cost you.
Written by
JeannepMember9 pieces · 8 followersFollow Jeannep to see new posts in your feed, on your phone or by email.
More from
Jeannep →Who gets praised in your team? The one who replies at 1am? The one who "never stops"? New HBR research by Els van der Helm: a survey of…
Nobody answers "any questions?"
Every briefing I've ever sat in ends the same way. The leader finishes, looks around the room and says "Any questions?" Silence. Two seconds. "Great, let's go." And then everyone walks out…
The manager who talks first decides the meeting
Watch what happens in a meeting right after the boss says what they think. Heads nod. Laptops close a little. The two people who had a different idea suddenly find it "not that important". Nobody told…